Depression decision support in primary care: a cluster randomized trial

Ann Intern Med. 2006 Oct 3;145(7):477-87. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-7-200610030-00005.

Abstract

Background: Intensive collaborative interventions improve depression outcomes, but the benefit of less intensive interventions is not clear.

Objective: To determine whether decision support improves outcomes for patients with depression.

Design: Clinician-level, cluster randomized, controlled trial.

Setting: 5 primary care clinics of 1 Veterans Affairs medical center.

Participants: 41 primary care clinicians, and 375 patients with depression (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9] depression scores of 10 to 25 or Hopkins Symptom Checklist-20 [SCL-20] scores > or = 1.0).

Measurements: The primary outcome was change in depression score (SCL-20) at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality-of-life (36-item Short Form for Veterans [SF-36V] score), patient satisfaction, antidepressant use, and health care utilization.

Intervention: Clinicians received depression education and were randomly assigned to depression decision support or usual care. The depression decision support team, which consisted of a psychiatrist and nurse, provided 1 early patient educational contact and depression monitoring with feedback to clinicians over 12 months.

Results: Although SCL-20 depression scores improved in both groups, the intervention had no effect compared with usual care. The difference in slopes comparing intervention and control over 12 months was 0.20 (95% CI, -0.37 to 0.78; P = 0.49), which was neither clinically nor statistically significant. Changes in SF-36V scores also did not differ between groups. At 12 months, intervention patients reported greater satisfaction (P = 0.002) and were more likely to have had at least 1 mental health specialty appointment (41.1% vs. 27.2%; P = 0.025), to have received any antidepressant (79.3% vs. 69.3%; P = 0.041), and to have received antidepressants for 90 days or more (76.2% vs. 61.6%; P = 0.008).

Limitations: Usual care clinicians received depression education and had on-site mental health support, which may have mitigated intervention effectiveness.

Conclusions: Decision support improved processes of care but not depression outcomes. More intensive care management or specialty treatment may be needed to improve depression outcomes.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Depression / therapy*
  • Female
  • Hospitals, Veterans
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Care / standards
  • Patient Care Team*
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Primary Health Care / methods*
  • Primary Health Care / standards*
  • Treatment Outcome