Objective: To report our experience of laparoscopic and vaginal radical trachelectomies.
Material and methods: Between February 2001 and May 2005, 10 patients met the requirements for a trachelectomy: 6 for a laparoscopic procedure, 4 for a vaginal procedure. In the laparoscopic procedure, coagulation of the uterine artery had to be performed in 2 patients whereas in the vaginal approach, it was always possible to conserve it.
Results: Mean age was 30 years. Median follow-up time was 25 months. Five patients were grade Ia2 and five were grade Ib1. One patient presented numerous lymphatic emboli and underwent radiation and chemotherapy. She died of a peritoneal progression of the disease. One had her baby with a scheduled C-section. One had a spontaneous miscarriage at 7 weeks.
Conclusion: The radical trachelectomy technique as described by Professor Dargent relies on the selective ligature of the cervico vaginal arteries and the necessity to preserve the uterine arteries. In our experience and that of others reported in the literature, the laparoscopic approach does not always permit to conserve them. In our opinion, the vaginal approach constitutes the best option.