[Pullout resistance of conventional pedicle screw implantation in comparison to fluoroscopic computer-assisted technique]

Zentralbl Chir. 2006 Oct;131(5):407-10. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-950383.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Aim: Aim of the study was to compare pullout resistance of pedicle screws after conventional and fluoroscopic computer-assisted implantation in the cadaveric thoracic and lumbar spine.

Methods: Pedicle screws were inserted in a total of 10 vertebrae of different human specimens: 10 screws were placed using conventional technique (group 1) and 10 screws were inserted with fluoroscopic computer-assisted system contralaterally (group 2). Then pedicle screws were evaluated for biomechanical axial pullout resistance.

Results: Mean pullout force was 232 N (range 60-600 N) in group 1 and 353 N (range 112-625 N) in group 2. The difference was significant (p=0,0425).

Conclusion: Fluoroscopic navigated implantation of pedicle screws increases the pullout strength in thoracic and lumbar cadaveric spines as compared with conventional methods.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Bone Wires*
  • Cadaver
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Female
  • Fluoroscopy*
  • Humans
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / surgery
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Spine / surgery*
  • Surgery, Computer-Assisted*
  • Thoracic Vertebrae / surgery