Facing the malpractice crisis: academic physicians' willingness to accept quick fix solutions

South Med J. 2006 Dec;99(12):1334-6. doi: 10.1097/01.smj.0000235483.54376.18.

Abstract

Background: We sought to determine the willingness of academic physicians to accept strategies to contain institutional malpractice costs.

Methods: We surveyed all 270 Department of Medicine physicians at a large academic center. Respondents were asked about their knowledge regarding malpractice premiums, willingness to reduce patient-care activities and accept decreases in compensation.

Results: The response rate was 80%. Respondents estimated the annual increase in malpractice premiums from 2004 to 2005 to be 29%. The true increase was 28% (P = 0.55). Almost all opposed eliminating patient care (95%) or providing patient care every other year at double effort and withdrawing from patient care on alternate years (97%). Seventy percent would limit their clinical procedures. Most physicians opposed salary reduction (97%) or decreases in fringe benefits (99%).

Conclusions: Few academic physicians are willing to limit patient care or accept decreases in compensation to recoup institutional malpractice costs.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Academic Medical Centers / economics*
  • Attitude of Health Personnel*
  • Cost Control
  • Data Collection
  • Faculty, Medical*
  • Female
  • Hospital Costs
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Malpractice / economics*
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Care
  • Salaries and Fringe Benefits