Comparative cost-minimisation of oral and intravenous chemotherapy for first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in the UK NHS system

Eur J Health Econ. 2007 Jun;8(2):145-51. doi: 10.1007/s10198-006-0034-1. Epub 2007 Feb 28.

Abstract

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence recommends vinorelbine (VNB), paclitaxel, docetaxel, and gemcitabine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. An economic model was prepared to determine the comparative cost of these agents, including the new oral formulation of VNB from a United Kingdom National Health System perspective. Clinical effectiveness was determined from published trials. Costs of drug acquisition, administration, toxicity management, and patient transportation costs were calculated from reference publications. A Markov model was used to estimate the cost per patient over 52 weeks. Intravenous VNB, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and docetaxel incur annual follow-up costs of 3,746 pounds, 5,332 pounds, 5,977 pounds, and 6,766 pounds, respectively, while oral VNB with outpatient administration on d1, and self-administration at home on d8 every 21 days has a cost per patient per year of 2,888 pounds. Oral VNB allows further hospital resources savings.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Oral
  • Antineoplastic Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Antineoplastic Agents / economics*
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / drug therapy*
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Drug Administration Routes
  • Home Care Services
  • Humans
  • Infusions, Intravenous
  • State Medicine
  • United Kingdom

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents