A cross-sectional comparison study of cognitive and emotional well-being in oral cancer patients

Oral Oncol. 2008 Feb;44(2):124-32. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2007.01.009. Epub 2007 Mar 13.

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to establish whether oral cancer patients were at risk of long-term problems with adaptation, whilst investigating contributory factors using a framework of Subjective Well-Being. Three samples of patients treated for either oral cancer (n=115); throat cancer (n=47), or benign conditions of the salivary gland (n=33) were recruited into a cross-sectional, postal questionnaire study. A gender and age matched healthy normative sample (n=115) was recruited for comparison purposes. Measures included The Satisfaction with Life Scale, the General Health Survey (SF-12), Life Orientation Test and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Patients with oral cancer demonstrated similar levels of cognitive and emotional well-being as the other samples. Time since treatment and the majority of clinical and treatment related factors had no effect on cognitive and emotional adaptation in any of the patient samples.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anxiety
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / psychology*
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / therapy
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Cognition*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Depression / psychology
  • Emotions*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Laryngeal Neoplasms / psychology
  • Laryngeal Neoplasms / therapy
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Mouth Neoplasms / psychology*
  • Mouth Neoplasms / therapy
  • Parotid Diseases / psychology
  • Parotid Diseases / therapy
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Psychometrics
  • Quality of Life
  • Regression Analysis
  • Sickness Impact Profile
  • Treatment Outcome