[Diagnosis of venous thromboembolism by single-detector row and multi-detector row CT angiography]

Tuberk Toraks. 2007;55(1):24-33.
[Article in Turkish]

Abstract

Aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic value of pulmonary angiography performed by either single-detector row CT (SDCT) or multi-detector row CT (MDCT) in patients suspected of venous thromboembolism (VTE). SDCT was performed on 36 and MDCT on 18 of total of 54 patients on whom V/Q scintigraphy was obtained with a suspicion of VTE. Sixteen out of 54 cases got additional pulmonary DSA. Statistical analyses were based on final clinical diagnoses of the individual cases. Twenty-six out of 54 cases in the study got the final diagnoses of VTE and VTE was certainly excluded in the remaining 28. Sixteen out of true 26 VTE cases were in the SDCT group while the other 10 cases took place in the MDCT group, none of which was missed by either technique. There was one false positive result in the SDCT group and none in the MDCT group (96% and 100% specificity respectively, 100% sensitivity for both). Only 9% of all pulmonary emboli detected by SDCT assisted pulmonary angiography were located in subsegmental arterial branches, whereas 24% of emboli detected by MDCT angiography were subsegmental. Both SDCT and MDCT angiography are reliable tests in the detection of VTE. MDCT assisted pulmonary angiography is superior than SDCT assisted pulmonary angiography in subsegmental VTE detection.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Angiography / methods*
  • False Positive Reactions
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Pulmonary Embolism / diagnosis*
  • Pulmonary Embolism / diagnostic imaging
  • Radiography, Thoracic
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*