Aim: The aim of this prospective comparative study was to compare the results of 8-years experience of endovascular treatment (ET) of popliteal aneurysms (PAs) using the Hemobahn/Viabahn endograft with those achieved with open repair (OR). Endpoints were primary and secondary patency rate.
Methods: The study was a prospective randomized clinical trial from January 1999 to December 2003 and a prospective comparative study from January 2004 to December 2006. Patients with an asymptomatic aneurismal lesion in the popliteal artery 2 cm at angio-computed tomography were included in the study. Indication for ET was PA (proximal and distal neck length >1 cm); contraindications were: 1) age <50 years; 2) poor distal run-off; 3) contraindication to antiplatelet, anticoagulant or thrombolytic therapy.
Results: Between January 1999 and December 2006, of a total of 42 patients with 48 PA, 27 were treated with OR (group A) and 21 with ET (group B). The primary patency rate was 100% in group A and 80.9% in group B at 12 months and 71.4% and 88.1%, respectively, at 72 months; the secondary patency rate at 72 months was 88.15% and 85.9% in groups A and B, respectively. No statistical differences were observed at the log-rank test. During the entire study period, 3 (14.3%) patients in group B required conversion to open surgery because of endograft occlusion.
Conclusion: Within the power limitations of this study, ET for asymptomatic PA in patients with suitable anatomy can be considered safe, with long-term results comparable with those of OR.