A prospective randomized comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2008;11(2):134-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500985. Epub 2007 May 29.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to elucidate the diagnostic efficacy between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy for prostate cancer. We prospectively randomized 200 consecutive men into two groups to undergo systematic prostate biopsy. Overall positivity for cancer was similar (47% by transperineal and 53% by transrectal; P=0.480). However, in case with 'gray zone' PSA (from 4.1 to 10.0 ng/ml), significantly more cores were positive when approach was transperineal, especially among transition zone cores. Therefore, urologist preferences are sufficient for choosing an approach, except for a possible small advantage of transperineal biopsy when PSA is in gray zone.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Anesthesia, Spinal
  • Biopsy, Needle / adverse effects
  • Biopsy, Needle / methods*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Perineum
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prostate / diagnostic imaging
  • Prostate / pathology*
  • Prostatic Diseases / diagnosis
  • Prostatic Diseases / pathology
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / pathology
  • Rectum
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional