A randomized controlled trial of clean intermittent self-catheterization versus suprapubic catheterization after urogynecologic surgery

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;197(1):72.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.043.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of significant bacteruria between clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) and suprapubic catheterization (SPC) after urogynecologic surgery.

Study design: Patients were randomized to CISC or SPC. A urinalysis and patient satisfaction questionnaire were conducted on postoperative days 2 and 7. Urine culture was performed for positive urinalysis. Significant bacteruria was defined as > 100,000 cfu/mL. To detect a decrease in bacteruria risk from 25% to 10%, 113 subjects per group were needed with 80% power and alpha of 0.05.

Results: Of 248 randomized patients, 210 were included in the final analysis. The overall risk of bacteruria was 27% with no difference between SPC and CISC (31% vs 23%, P = .23). Patients reported more frustration (P = .01) and more difficulty (P = .003) using CISC.

Conclusion: There was no difference in risk of significant bacteruria between CISC and SPC. Patients reported more frustration and difficulty with self-catheterization.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Bacteriuria / etiology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Risk Factors
  • Self Care
  • Time Factors
  • Urinary Catheterization / adverse effects*
  • Urinary Catheterization / methods
  • Urogenital Surgical Procedures