Comparison of laparoscopic vs open sigmoid colectomy for benign and malignant disease at academic medical centers

J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Nov;11(11):1423-9; discussion 1429-30. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0269-x. Epub 2007 Sep 1.

Abstract

Few studies have examined outcomes of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy performed at US academic centers. Using ICD-9 diagnosis and procedural codes, data was obtained from the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) Clinical Database of 10,603 patients who underwent laparoscopic or open sigmoid colectomy for benign and malignant disease between 2003-2006. A total of 1,092 patients (10.3%) underwent laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy. Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy was associated with a significantly shorter length of stay (5.4 vs 7.4 days), lower overall complication rate (19.7 vs 26.0%), lower 30-day readmission rate (3.4 vs 4.6), and a lower hospital cost ($13,814 vs $15,626). When a subset analysis of malignant and benign groups was performed, a significantly shorter length of stay in both the malignant laparoscopic group (6.4 +/- 6.4 vs 7.8 +/- 6.6 days) and in the benign laparoscopic groups (5.1 +/- 3.5 vs 7.2 +/- 7.6) exists. A lower wound complication rate (2.1 vs 5.5%, malignant and 4.0 vs 6.1, benign) is also evident. Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy was associated with a shorter length of stay, less complications, and a lower 30-day readmission rate. The shorter length of stay and wound infection rate maintain significance when comparing laparoscopic vs open sigmoid resections for malignant and benign disease.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Academic Medical Centers / statistics & numerical data
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Colectomy / methods*
  • Colonic Diseases / mortality
  • Colonic Diseases / surgery*
  • Colonic Neoplasms / mortality
  • Colonic Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Female
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States