Objectives: A cross-sectional investigation was designed to assess the quality of local government plans for public health emergencies and to determine whether relevant regulations for emergency plans are in place.
Methods: Sixty-six municipalities were selected randomly using stratified sampling, and a questionnaire investigation on emergency plans was conducted in these municipalities.
Results: The findings show that approximately 50% of emergency plans omitted important content; less than 50% of municipalities had established three regulations for emergency plans.
Conclusions: Based on the analysis, the quality of existing public health emergency plans is not sufficient. More than 50% of municipalities lack regulations for emergency plans. Suggestions regarding the responsibility of government at different levels are made. First, central government should draw up a set of standard development procedures and a standard template for emergency plans. Secondly, local governments should revise their plans. Thirdly, local governments should establish regulations for emergency plans as soon as possible.