Purpose: To evaluate the impact of adaptative image-guided brachytherapy on therapeutic outcome and toxicity in prostate cancer.
Materials and methods: The 1,110 first patients treated at the CHUQ-l'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec were divided in five groups depending on the technique used for the implantation, the latest being intra operative treatment planning. Biochemical disease free survival (5-bDFS), toxicities and dosimetric parameters were compared between the groups.
Results: 5-bDFS (ASTRO+Houston) were of 88.5% and 90.5% for the whole cohort. The use of intra operative treatment planning resulted in better dosimetric parameters. Clinically, this resulted in a decreased use of urethral catheterism, from 18.8% in group 1 to 5.2% in group 5, and in a reduction in severe acute urinary side effects (21.3 vs 33.3% P=0.01) when compared with preplanning. There was also less late gastrointestinal side effects (groups 5 vs 1: 26.6 vs 43.2% P<0.05). Finally, when compared with preplanning, intra operative treatment planning was associated with a smaller reduction between planned D90 and the dose calculated at the CT scan 1 month after the implant (38 vs 66 Gy).
Conclusion: The evolution of prostate brachytherapy technique toward intra operative treatment planning allowed dosimetric gains which resulted in significant clinical benefits by increasing the therapeutic ratio mainly through a decreased urinary toxicity. A longer follow-up will answer the question whether there is an impact on 5-bDFS.