A comparison of the penetration rate of two polyethylene acetabular liners of different levels of cross-linking. A prospective randomised trial

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Nov;89(11):1439-45. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B11.19543.

Abstract

We carried out a prospective randomised study designed to compare the penetration rate of acetabular polyethylene inserts of identical design but different levels of cross-linking at a minimum of four years follow-up. A total of 102 patients (102 hips) were randomised to receive either highly cross-linked Durasul, or contemporary Sulene polyethylene inserts at total hip replacement. A single blinded observer used the Martell system to assess penetration of the femoral head. At a mean follow-up of 4.9 years (4.2 to 6.1) the mean femoral head penetration rate was 0.025 mm/year (SD 0.128) in the Durasul group compared with 0.106 mm/year (SD 0.109) in the Sulene group (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.0027). The mean volumetric penetration rate was 29.24 mm(3)/year (SD 44.08) in the Durasul group compared with 53.32 mm(3)/year (SD 48.68) in the Sulene group. The yearly volumetric penetration rate was 55% lower in the Durasul group (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.0058). Longer term results are needed to investigate whether less osteolysis will occur.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Acetabulum / physiology
  • Acetabulum / surgery*
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Body Mass Index
  • Equipment Failure Analysis
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hip Prosthesis*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Polyethylene / analysis
  • Polyethylene / metabolism
  • Polyethylene / therapeutic use*
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Prosthesis Design / standards
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Statistics, Nonparametric
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Polyethylene