Surgical outcomes of traditional limbal-based versus fornix-based trabeculectomy with corneal valve

Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2007 Nov-Dec;38(6):471-7. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20071101-05.

Abstract

Background and objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of fornix-based trabeculectomy with corneal valve to traditional limbal-based trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC) in eyes with open-angle glaucoma.

Patients and methods: In this retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative study, 42 eyes that underwent limbal-based trabeculectomy with MMC were compared with 32 eyes with fornix-based trabeculectomy with corneal valve with MMC. Success was defined as final intraocular pressure (IOP) of at least 20% less than preoperative IOP and between 5 and 22 mm Hg. mean IOPs were 23.5 +/- 12.2 and 11.5 +/- 5.3 mm Hg, respectively, in the limbal-based group and 24.8 +/- 11.1 and 11.7 +/- 2.5 mm Hg, respectively, in the fornix-based group (P < .001 and P = .85, respectively). The fornix-based group had significantly less hypotony (3% vs. 21%, P < .05).

Conclusions: Fornix-based corneal valve trabeculectomy with posterior placement of MMC sponges provides IOP control comparable to limbal-based traditional trabeculectomy, with decreased incidence of hypotony.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Alkylating Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Combined Modality Therapy
  • Conjunctiva / surgery
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Glaucoma, Open-Angle / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Intraocular Pressure
  • Limbus Corneae / surgery
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Mitomycin / administration & dosage*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Surgical Flaps*
  • Trabeculectomy / methods*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Visual Acuity

Substances

  • Alkylating Agents
  • Mitomycin