Randomized double-blinded trial investigating the impact of a curriculum focused on error recognition on laparoscopic suturing training

Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):179-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.11.001.

Abstract

Background: Error recognition predicts technical skill. A curriculum including error recognition may improve laparoscopic suturing performance.

Methods: Thirty novices were randomized into 2 groups. Each viewed an instruction videotape and underwent timed objective structured assessments of technical skills. Group A practiced the task, group B viewed an error-instruction video, practiced, followed by re-assessment. Participants counted errors on a videotape. Data were analyzed with the Fisher exact text, the Wilcoxon test, and the Kendall tau test.

Results: The improvement in task time was greater in group A than in group B (P < .001). The objective structured assessments of technical skills scores improved for both groups, but did not reveal differences between the groups. Group B recognized significantly more errors than group A (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The additional error instruction showed a negative impact on performance speed, but improved cognitive error recognition. Whether visual memory overload influenced the outcome requires further examination.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Clinical Competence
  • Curriculum*
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Education, Medical, Undergraduate / methods
  • Educational Measurement
  • Female
  • General Surgery / education*
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy* / methods
  • Male
  • Medical Errors
  • Probability
  • Students, Medical
  • Suture Techniques / education*
  • Task Performance and Analysis
  • Time Factors
  • Video Recording