[A comparison of costs and survival in colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery according to different organizational models]

Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2007 Nov;99(11):643-7. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082007001100004.
[Article in Spanish]

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effectiveness and costs of different organizational models in caring for colorectal cancer patients through either clinical management functional units or traditional clinical services.

Method: Post-operative and long-term (after 30 days and 5 years) mortality was analyzed according to number of patients undergoing surgery because of colorectal cancer. Mortality was adjusted for patient-related confounding factors. With that purpose a thorough review of the literature was conducted; information obtained was used in a meta-analysis of randomized effects. Concerning costs, a literature search was run to describe differences in number of patients per year between hospitals.

Results: Surgery costs were found to be smaller, and mean hospital stay shorter, in big-sized hospitals. The meta-analysis showed that the risk of death at 30 days and 5 years was lower in big hospitals versus smaller ones (OR: 1.112; 95% CI 0.986-1.255, and OR: 1.114; 95% CI 1.105-1.183, respectively).

Conclusions: Short- and long-term postoperative mortality is lower in hospitals with a high number of cases per year.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Colorectal Neoplasms / economics*
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / mortality*
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / surgery
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Health Facility Size
  • Humans
  • Models, Organizational
  • Survival Analysis