Fluoroscopic insertion of post-pyloric feeding tubes: success rates and complications

Clin Radiol. 2008 May;63(5):543-8. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2007.11.005. Epub 2008 Feb 6.

Abstract

Aim: To examine the success and complication rates of radiological placement of post-pyloric feeding tubes, including those inserted with the assistance of a guide-wire.

Materials and methods: Two hundred referrals (156 patients), between the dates of 5 April 2002 and 10 September 2004, were identified retrospectively from computerized records. Subsequently, the radiology reports and patients' notes were reviewed to evaluate the indications for post-pyloric feeding, success of placement, use of a guide-wire, and any complications.

Results: A post-pyloric tube was placed in the distal duodenum/jejunum in 183 (91.5%) patients and in the proximal duodenum or distal stomach in six (3%). A tube could not be inserted in 11 (5.5%) patients, and 51 (25.5%) of the insertions required the use of a guide-wire. Immediate complications were recorded in seven patients (3.5%): vomiting (n=5); hypotension and apnoea requiring naloxone (n=1) and hypoxia requiring endotracheal intubation (n=1).

Conclusion: Radiological placement of post-pyloric feeding tubes has a success rate comparable with endoscopically placed tubes, and it rarely involves significant technique-related complications.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • England
  • Enteral Nutrition / instrumentation*
  • Enteral Nutrition / methods
  • Female
  • Fluoroscopy
  • Humans
  • Intubation, Gastrointestinal / adverse effects
  • Intubation, Gastrointestinal / instrumentation
  • Intubation, Gastrointestinal / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome