Is routine changing of peripheral arterial catheters justified?

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 Sep;14(9):813-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02001.x. Epub 2008 Apr 3.

Abstract

Although peripheral arterial catheters (pACs) are used extensively, disagreement persists concerning the practice of scheduled replacement to prevent catheter-related infections. Despite recommendations and no proof of benefit, pAC replacement continues to be scheduled as a routine practice in many intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide. Our own experience in an oncology ICU, based on a 217-device database, confirms that the risk for pAC-related infections is stable over time, arguing against scheduled replacement. The low rate and stability of the risk of pAC-related infections supports the rationale for conservative management in accordance with expert recommendations.

Publication types

  • Editorial

MeSH terms

  • Catheterization, Peripheral*
  • Cross Infection / prevention & control*
  • Humans
  • Infection Control / methods*
  • Intensive Care Units