Clinical impact of the use of additional ultrasonography in diagnostic breast imaging

Eur Radiol. 2008 Oct;18(10):2076-84. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0983-0. Epub 2008 Apr 23.

Abstract

The degree of adherence with evidence-based guidelines for the use of breast ultrasonography was determined in clinical practice of radiologists in six hospitals. Additional ultrasonography was performed in 2,272 (53%) of all 4,257 patients referred for mammography. High adherence rates (mean: 95%) were observed for guidelines recommending ultrasonography in patients referred for palpable breast masses and abnormal screening and diagnostic mammograms. Lower adherence rates (mean: 81%, Pearson correlation coefficient= -0.57; p=0.001) were found for guidelines advising against additional ultrasonography in patients referred for breast symptoms, a known benign abnormality, a family history or anxiety of breast cancer. The overuse of ultrasonography in 442 patients and underuse in 95 patients led to five additional false-positive results. It was concluded that the guidelines seem workable and feasible in clinical practice and that the current daily routine of diagnostic breast imaging corresponded to a great extent to the guidelines proposed.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Breast Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Breast Neoplasms / epidemiology*
  • Female
  • Guideline Adherence / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic*
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians' / standards*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Risk Assessment / methods
  • Risk Assessment / standards
  • Risk Factors
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Ultrasonography, Mammary / standards*
  • Ultrasonography, Mammary / statistics & numerical data*