Sorption of aromatic compounds to clay mineral and model humic substance-clay complex: effects of solute structure and exchangeable cation

J Environ Qual. 2008 May 2;37(3):817-23. doi: 10.2134/jeq2007.0217. Print 2008 May-Jun.

Abstract

Clay minerals and humic substance (HS)-clay complexes are widely distributed in soil environments. Improved predictions on the uptake of organic pollutants by soil require a better understanding of fundamental mechanisms that control the relative contribution from organic and inorganic constituents. Five selected aromatic compounds varying in electronic structure, including nonpolar phenanthrene (PHEN), 1,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzene (TeCB), polar 1,3-dinitrobenzene (DNB), 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile (dichlobenil [DNL]), and 1-naphthalenyl methylcarbamate (carbaryl [CBL]), were sorbed separately from aqueous solution to Na(+)-, K(+)-, Cs(+)-, and Ca(2+)-saturated montmorillonites with and without the presence of dissolved HS at pH about 6. Upon normalizing for hydrophobic effects by solute aqueous solubility, the overall trend of sorptive affinity to HS-free K(+)-clay is DNB >> DNL, CBL > PHEN, TeCB, indicating preferential adsorption of the polar solutes. With the presence of HS, sorption of PHEN, TeCB, and CBL increases by several times compared with the pure clay, attributed to HS-facilitated hydrophobic partition (PHEN and TeCB) or H-bonding (CBL). The enhanced sorption of PHEN by HS is cation dependent, where Cs(+) shows the strongest facilitative effect. Coadsorption of HS does not affect sorption of DNB and DNL to clays except that of DNB to Ca(2+)-clay because cation-dipole interactions between the polar group (NO(2) or CN) of solute and weakly hydrated exchangeable cations dominate the overall sorption.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aluminum Silicates*
  • Cations
  • Clay
  • Humic Substances*
  • X-Ray Diffraction

Substances

  • Aluminum Silicates
  • Cations
  • Humic Substances
  • Clay