Iso-osmolality versus low-osmolality iodinated contrast medium at intravenous contrast-enhanced CT: effect on kidney function

Radiology. 2008 Jul;248(1):97-105. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2481071484. Epub 2008 May 15.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the effects of iso-osmolality contrast medium compared with a low-osmolality agent on renal function (serum creatinine [SCr] and glomerular filtration rate [GFR]) in high-risk patients undergoing intravenous contrast material-enhanced CT.

Materials and methods: This HIPAA-compliant study was IRB-approved; formal consent was obtained. One hundred seventeen patients (83 men, 34 women; mean age, 64.3 years; range, 18-86 years) with decreased renal function underwent contrast-enhanced CT with either iso-osmolality iodixanol (n = 61) or low-osmolality iopromide (n = 56). Outcome measures were of SCr increase or GFR decrease for 3 days after CT, a SCr increase (of >or=0.5 mg/dL [44.2 micromol/L, 25%] or >or=1.0 mg/dL [88.4 micromol/L, 50%]), a GFR reduction (of >or=5 mL/min), and patient outcome at 30- and 90-day follow-up.

Results: Iodixanol decreased SCr (mean +/- standard deviation) from 1.77 mg/dL +/- 0.24 (156.47 micromol/L +/- 21.22) at baseline to 1.65 mg/dL +/- 0.35 (145.86 micromol/L +/- 30.94, P = .046) at day 1, 1.73 mg/dL +/- 0.53 (152.93 micromol/L +/- 46.85, not significant) at day 2, and 1.73 mg/dL +/- 0.55 (152.93 micromol/L +/- 48.62, not significant) at day 3 (not significant). Iopromide increased SCr from 1.75 mg/dL +/- 0.32 (154.7 micromol/L +/- 28.29) at baseline to 1.8 mg/dL +/- 0.42 (159.12 micromol/L +/- 15.59) at day 1, 1.77 mg/dL +/- 0.49 (156.47 micromol/L +/- 43.32) at day 2, and 1.77 mg/dL +/- 0.62 (156.47 micromol/L +/- 54.81) at day 3 (not significant). Iodixanol increased and iopromide decreased GFR on all 3 days after CT (not significant). Fewer patients in the iodixanol group (8.5%) than in the iopromide group (27.8%) had SCr increase 0.5 mg/dL or higher (>or=25%, P = .012). Two patients in each group had SCr increase of 1.0 mg/dL or more (not significant). More patients in the iopromide group (42.3%) than in the iodoxanol group (24.1%) had a GFR reduction of 5 mL/min or higher (P = .0426). No patient had a contrast material-related adverse event at 30- or 90-day follow-up.

Conclusion: Intravenous contrast material application in high-risk patients is unlikely to be associated with permanent adverse outcomes. SCr levels after contrast material administration are lower in iodixanol than iopromide groups.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Controlled Clinical Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Contrast Media / adverse effects
  • Creatinine / blood*
  • Female
  • Glomerular Filtration Rate / drug effects*
  • Humans
  • Iohexol / administration & dosage
  • Iohexol / adverse effects
  • Iohexol / analogs & derivatives*
  • Iohexol / chemistry
  • Kidney Diseases / blood*
  • Kidney Diseases / chemically induced
  • Kidney Diseases / diagnostic imaging*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Osmolar Concentration
  • Radiography
  • Triiodobenzoic Acids / administration & dosage
  • Triiodobenzoic Acids / adverse effects*
  • Triiodobenzoic Acids / chemistry

Substances

  • Contrast Media
  • Triiodobenzoic Acids
  • Iohexol
  • iopromide
  • Creatinine
  • iodixanol