Cost effectiveness of enzyme immunoassay and immunoblot testing for the diagnosis of syphilis

Int J STD AIDS. 2008 Jun;19(6):393-9. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2007.007272.

Abstract

The burden of disease and associated health-care costs of syphilis are significant despite widespread screening and treatment. Our objective was to conduct an economic evaluation using a simulation model when comparing enzyme immunoassay (EIA) initial testing and Inno-Lia (IL) confirmatory testing (EIA + IL) with rapid plasma reagin (RPR) initial testing and Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay (TPPA) and fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption assay (FTA-ABS) confirmatory testing (RPR + TPPA/FTA). Estimates of prevalence, test costs and utilization of services for 2006 were derived from Alberta databases. Estimates of test characteristics were derived from the available literature. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was Canadian $461 per additional correct diagnosis (less costly and more effective). EIA + IL is cost-effective when compared with RPR + TPPA/FTA for screening and diagnosis of syphilis.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Antibodies, Bacterial / blood*
  • Humans
  • Immunoblotting / methods
  • Immunoenzyme Techniques / methods
  • Syphilis / diagnosis*
  • Syphilis / economics*
  • Syphilis Serodiagnosis / economics*
  • Syphilis Serodiagnosis / methods
  • Treponema pallidum / immunology*
  • Treponema pallidum / isolation & purification

Substances

  • Antibodies, Bacterial