Geographic differences in acute stroke care in Catalunya: impact of a regional interhospital network

Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26(3):284-8. doi: 10.1159/000147457. Epub 2008 Jul 23.

Abstract

Limited resources prevent specialized care in community hospitals (CH) challenging geographical equity. We studied the impact of a regional interhospital network based on urgent transfer from 4 CH to a referral stroke center (RSC).

Methods: During 2006, all stroke patients admitted to the 5 networked hospitals (4 CH, 1 RSC) were studied: clinical pathways and stroke interventions were recorded. Physicians at CH decided emergent transfer under their clinical judgment. Quality therapeutic measures where defined: urgent expert neurological evaluation, stroke unit admission and thrombolytic treatment. For patients receiving tissue plasminogen activator, demographic and outcome data were recorded: clinical improvement (decrease > or =4 National Institute of Health Stroke Scale points at discharge), total recovery (3-month modified Rankin Scale score > or =1).

Results: From a total of 1,925 acute stroke patients, 1,587 were admitted to the RSC (1,396 primarily). Of 529 primarily admitted to CH, 191 (36.1%) were emergently transferred. Patients primarily admitted to the RSC were more frequently evaluated by a neurologist (100 vs. 34%; p < 0.001) and admitted to a stroke unit (22.7 vs. 11.7%; p < 0.001). However, the rate of thrombolytic treatment was similar (4.4 vs. 5.1%; p = 0.491). After initial assessment at the RSC, 92 (48.2%) transfers were considered unnecessary. Transferred patients accounted for 27/88 (30.7%) thrombolyses performed in the RSC. Baseline characteristics were similar, except a longer time to treatment (164 vs. 211 min; p = 0.004) and more frequent early ischemia CT signs among transferred patients (23 vs. 53%; p = 0.037). Clinical improvement (62 vs. 50%; p = 0.273) and symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (6.8 vs. 3.8%; p = 0.596) were similar. However, among transferred patients, the degree of total recovery was lower (44 vs. 22%; p = 0.05).

Conclusion: An interhospital network based on transfers to an RSC does not warrant geographical equity: equal access to best therapeutic interventions is only partially achieved at the expense of a high proportion of unnecessary transfers.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Acute Disease
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Community Networks / organization & administration*
  • Critical Pathways / organization & administration
  • Female
  • Health Services Accessibility*
  • Healthcare Disparities*
  • Hospitals, Community / organization & administration*
  • Hospitals, University / organization & administration*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neurologic Examination
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care*
  • Patient Transfer*
  • Program Evaluation
  • Regional Health Planning
  • Residence Characteristics
  • Spain
  • Stroke / diagnosis
  • Stroke / therapy*
  • Thrombolytic Therapy
  • Treatment Outcome