Laparoscopic 3-step restorative proctocolectomy: comparative study with open approach in 45 patients

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008 Aug;18(4):357-62. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181772d75.

Abstract

Background: To compare the results of a total laparoscopic versus open approach 3-time ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) for patients with acute or severe colitis complicating inflammatory bowel disease.

Methods: Consecutive subtotal colectomy was followed by IPAA then by stoma closure. Between 2000 and 2006, 23 consecutive patients, operated through a total laparoscopic approach were well matched with 22 patients operated by open approach.

Results: Overall major complications rate was lower after laparoscopic than after open approach (5/23 vs. 9/22; NS). Mean hospital stay for the 3 consecutive procedures was significantly reduced after laparoscopic versus open approach (27+/-7 d vs. 39+/-27 d; P<0.05).

Conclusions: Our case-control study suggests that, in experienced centers, a total laparoscopic approach can be viewed as a viable alternative to conventional open 3-step IPAA for the treatment of acute or severe colitis complicating inflammatory bowel disease.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cohort Studies
  • Colitis, Ulcerative / surgery*
  • Colonic Pouches*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy*
  • Laparotomy
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Proctocolectomy, Restorative / adverse effects
  • Proctocolectomy, Restorative / methods*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome