Penile reconstruction/formation

Curr Opin Urol. 2008 Nov;18(6):589-97. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328313679c.

Abstract

Purpose of review: To evaluate current reviews and assess scientific validity of the recent literature on penile reconstruction after trauma, penile reconstruction in gender reassignment surgery, concealed penis, and aphallia.

Recent findings: Technical advances in penile reconstruction have been highlighted. The few long-term follow-up studies available confirm the difficulty of such surgery, in terms of complications and the limits of the final achievable outcomes. The surgery necessitates several steps and a high number of revisions. Scientific progress in penile reconstruction seems slow, with a lack of controlled studies, high rate of loss to follow-up (especially in sex reassignment surgery) and a lack of validated assessment measures. However, a few recent studies are making the problems clearer, especially in patient selection and the avoidance of raising false expectations in patients.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Male
  • Penile Diseases / surgery*
  • Penile Implantation
  • Penile Prosthesis
  • Penis / abnormalities
  • Penis / injuries
  • Penis / surgery*
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures* / adverse effects
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures* / instrumentation
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Surgical Flaps
  • Transsexualism / surgery*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male* / adverse effects
  • Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male* / instrumentation
  • Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male* / methods