Regeneration, health status and quality of life after rhG-CSF-stimulated stem cell collection in healthy donors: a cross-sectional study

Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009 Mar;43(5):357-63. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2008.335. Epub 2008 Oct 20.

Abstract

Mobilized allogeneic PBPC are increasingly used instead of BM for allogeneic stem cell grafting. Although the short-term safety profile of recombinant human (rh)G-CSF seems acceptable, only minimal data on long-term safety are available. We therefore reviewed data on 171 sibling donors (M/F: 98/73) with respect to side effects of rhG-CSF and PBPC collection and impact on quality of life (QoL) and health status. In a cross-sectional study, we investigated the actual QoL and health status of the donors as well as the need for medical treatment since PBPC donation by a questionnaire that was sent to 151 donors. Ninety-five (64%) of the addressed donors responded to the questionnaire, but only 69 (46%) of them reported on their actual health status and QoL, which was good to very good in the majority of them. Two donors developed malignancies in the post-donation course. In general, PBPC collection after rhG-CSF mobilization was well tolerated by the responding donors. Although the reported events in medical history after PBPC donation do not seem to be associated with rhG-CSF administration or the collection procedure, a lifelong follow-up of donors should be obligatory.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cell Separation
  • Child
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor / adverse effects
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor / pharmacology*
  • Health Status*
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization*
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cells / physiology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Quality of Life*
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Regeneration
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tissue Donors / psychology*

Substances

  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor