Marrow storage techniques: a clinical comparison of refrigeration versus cryopreservation

Acta Haematol. 1991;85(4):173-8. doi: 10.1159/000204886.

Abstract

Fifty-three patients were evaluated for a comparison of the efficacy, safety, and cost efficiency of bone marrow (BM) transplanted after either refrigeration or cryopreservation. Thirty-eight patients had BM stored at 4 degrees C for an average of 3 days and 15 patients had cryopreserved BM stored for an average of 56 days. The average number of cells harvested was 3.8 x 10(8)/kg. The time to WBC recovery greater than 1 x 10(9)/l was 17 days refrigerated and 23 days for cryopreserved BM. The time to platelet recovery greater than 20 x 10(9)/l was 24 days for refrigeration storage and 51 days for cryopreserved BM. Four of 38 patients with refrigerated vs. 4/15 patients with cryopreserved BM experienced delayed engraftment (p less than 0.05). Refrigeration storage requires no special equipment, is cheaper than and presents a safe and viable alternative to cryopreserved BM in reconstituting hemopoiesis following high-dose chemo-radiotherapy.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Bone Marrow / physiology*
  • Bone Marrow Transplantation*
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Cryopreservation*
  • Female
  • Hematopoiesis
  • Hodgkin Disease / blood
  • Hodgkin Disease / therapy
  • Humans
  • Leukemia / blood
  • Leukemia / therapy
  • Leukocyte Count
  • Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin / blood
  • Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin / therapy
  • Male
  • Platelet Count
  • Refrigeration*
  • Time Factors
  • Tissue Preservation / economics
  • Tissue Preservation / methods*