Medium-term comparison of continence rates after rectus fascia or midurethral sling placement

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;200(3):300.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.10.017. Epub 2009 Jan 24.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare continence rates after placement of rectus fascia or midurethral slings.

Study design: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 242 women who underwent rectus fascia (n = 79) or midurethral (n = 163) sling procedures to treat urinary incontinence. Outcome was based on responses to validated questionnaires and need for interim treatment for incontinence. Survival free of incontinence was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations between patient factors and survival free of incontinence were evaluated by fitting Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: Women with rectus fascia slings were more likely to report any leakage of urine (P = .04) and were 13 times more likely to require urethrolysis (P < .001) than patients with midurethral slings. Patient satisfaction was lower in the rectus fascia sling group compared with the midurethral sling group (P = .01).

Conclusion: Midurethral slings appear to be more effective than rectus fascia slings and are less likely to cause postoperative voiding complications.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cohort Studies
  • Fasciotomy
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Intraoperative Complications
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Satisfaction*
  • Polypropylenes
  • Postoperative Complications / prevention & control*
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Suburethral Slings*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Urethra / surgery
  • Urinary Catheterization
  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress / surgery*

Substances

  • Polypropylenes