Background: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is still the first cause of maternal mortality in France. Most of these cases include inappropriate management. In 2004, regional guidelines were diffused to all the birthplaces in Basse-Normandie. To assess the impact of this regional management, an epidemiological study "before-after" (2002-2005) has been performed. Part of this study was the evaluation of the management of severe PPH.
Objective: This study assessed the quality of care for major PPH and the correct follow-up of the guidelines before and after 2004.
Material and methods: A clinical audit has been conducted in all the birthplaces from the region to assess the management of all severe PPH identified during 2002 and 2005. PPH were considered as severe when they presented one or more of the following: blood transfusion, uterine embolisation, hemostatic surgery, difference in hemoglobin rates greater than 4 g / dl, or maternal death. All of these cases have been analysed except those defined by hemoglobin difference. Assessment has been carried out by pairs of practitioners (obstetrician and anesthetist) blinded to the origin of the case. Criteria assessed were the quality of care for major PPH, the correct follow-up of the guidelines and the degree of severity of the PPH which was estimated as moderate or severe on clinical arguments.
Results: The number of severe PPH was 34 in 2002 and 63 in 2005. The quality of care was increased with rates of inadequate management falling from 32 to 13% (p < 0,02), respectively. The follow-up of the guidelines was correct in the whole area, most of the criteria having been respected in about 90% of cases in 2005. However, active management of the third stage of delivery was only conducted in 71% of cases. The rates of severe PPH were not significantly different between 2002 (44%) and 2005 (38%).
Conclusion: The originality from this study is that the modifications of the practices were conducted at a regional level in order to enhance the management of PPH. The assessment which was performed showed that quality of care was improved all over the area but that there is still place to progress.