Purpose: To quantitatively compare spiral imaging and sensitivity-encoded-echo-planar-imaging (SENSE-EPI) methods for blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) imaging using controlled changes in the end-tidal partial pressure of CO(2) (PetCO(2)) to provide a global BOLD response. Specifically, we examined susceptibility-field-gradient effects on the BOLD sensitivity throughout the brain.
Materials and methods: We quantified cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) using the BOLD response to cyclic changes in PetCO(2) in five healthy volunteers at 1.5 and 3.0 T using spiral imaging and SENSE-EPI. We compared the two techniques with respect to susceptibility-induced signal dropout and CVR t-statistic.
Results: Compared to spiral imaging, SENSE-EPI significantly reduced the volume of signal dropout by 32 +/- 18% at 3.0 T. In regions with large susceptibility gradients, SENSE-EPI demonstrated a trend for a greater t-statistic than spiral imaging, particularly at 3.0 T. However, no statistically significant between-technique differences existed.
Conclusion: The results at 3.0 T suggest that, compared with spiral imaging, SENSE-EPI reduces signal loss associated with susceptibility field gradients in affected regions without affecting BOLD sensitivity. This study also demonstrates a unique application of controlled PetCO(2) changes to quantitatively compare BOLD techniques, which may be useful for the design of future fMRI studies.