Evaluation of safety in a radiation oncology setting using failure mode and effects analysis

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Jul 1;74(3):852-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.038. Epub 2009 May 4.

Abstract

Purpose: Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a widely used tool for prospectively evaluating safety and reliability. We report our experiences in applying FMEA in the setting of radiation oncology.

Methods and materials: We performed an FMEA analysis for our external beam radiation therapy service, which consisted of the following tasks: (1) create a visual map of the process, (2) identify possible failure modes; assign risk probability numbers (RPN) to each failure mode based on tabulated scores for the severity, frequency of occurrence, and detectability, each on a scale of 1 to 10; and (3) identify improvements that are both feasible and effective. The RPN scores can span a range of 1 to 1000, with higher scores indicating the relative importance of a given failure mode.

Results: Our process map consisted of 269 different nodes. We identified 127 possible failure modes with RPN scores ranging from 2 to 160. Fifteen of the top-ranked failure modes were considered for process improvements, representing RPN scores of 75 and more. These specific improvement suggestions were incorporated into our practice with a review and implementation by each department team responsible for the process.

Conclusions: The FMEA technique provides a systematic method for finding vulnerabilities in a process before they result in an error. The FMEA framework can naturally incorporate further quantification and monitoring. A general-use system for incident and near miss reporting would be useful in this regard.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms*
  • Humans
  • Medical Errors / prevention & control*
  • Probability
  • Quality Control
  • Radiation Oncology / standards*
  • Risk Assessment / methods
  • Risk Assessment / standards
  • Safety Management / methods*