Assessment of an alternative meropenem dosing strategy compared with imipenem-cilastatin or traditional meropenem dosing after cefepime failure or intolerance in adults with neutropenic fever

Pharmacotherapy. 2009 Aug;29(8):914-23. doi: 10.1592/phco.29.8.914.

Abstract

Study objective: To compare clinical outcomes of patients receiving an alternative dosage of meropenem with those of patients receiving imipenem-cilastatin or the traditional dosage of meropenem after failure of or intolerance to cefepime for treatment of febrile neutropenia.

Design: Retrospective, single-center cohort study.

Setting: 1250-bed urban academic medical center.

Patients: One hundred twenty-seven adults with neutropenic fever who received either imipenem-cilastatin or meropenem; imipenem-cilastatin was the preferred carbapenem until September 1, 2006, after which meropenem became the formulary carbapenem.

Measurements and main results: Of the 127 patients, 40 received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg every 6 hours between September 1, 2005, and August 31, 2006; 87 patients received meropenem between September 1, 2006, and August 31, 2007: 29 received a traditional dosage of meropenem 1 g every 8 hours, and 58 received an alternative dosage of meropenem 500 mg every 6 hours. Primary outcomes of time to defervescence (median 3 vs 2 vs 3 days), need for additional antibiotics (20% vs 17% vs 14%), and time to receipt of additional antibiotics (median 5 vs 2 vs 1 days) were not significantly different among the imipenem-cilastatin, traditionally dosed meropenem, and alternatively dosed meropenem groups, respectively. In addition, significant differences in secondary outcomes, which were treatment duration (median 10 vs 8 vs 8 days), seizure rate (0% vs 0% vs 0%), in-hospital mortality (5% vs 7% vs 7%), and 30-day mortality (13% vs 7% vs 14%), were not identified among the three groups, respectively.

Conclusion: The alternative meropenem dosage of 500 mg every 6 hours yielded similar patient outcomes, including time to defervescence, need for additional antibiotics, duration of therapy, and mortality, when compared with the traditional meropenem dosage and imipenem-cilastatin in adults with febrile neutropenia. In addition, no adverse effects on clinical outcomes were observed with the alternative dosage of meropenem.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / adverse effects
  • Cefepime
  • Cephalosporins / adverse effects*
  • Cephalosporins / therapeutic use
  • Cilastatin / administration & dosage
  • Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination
  • Cohort Studies
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Drug Combinations
  • Female
  • Fever / complications
  • Fever / drug therapy*
  • Fever / mortality
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Humans
  • Imipenem / administration & dosage
  • Male
  • Meropenem
  • Middle Aged
  • Neutropenia / complications
  • Neutropenia / drug therapy*
  • Neutropenia / mortality
  • Retreatment
  • Seizures / drug therapy
  • Thienamycins / administration & dosage*
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Cephalosporins
  • Drug Combinations
  • Thienamycins
  • Cilastatin
  • Imipenem
  • Cefepime
  • Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination
  • Meropenem