Accuracy of noninvasive coronary stenosis quantification of different commercially available dedicated software packages

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 Jul-Aug;33(4):505-12. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181888363.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the noninvasive quantification of coronary artery stenosis using cardiac software packages and vessel phantoms with known stenosis severity.

Materials and methods: Four different sizes of vessel phantoms were filled with contrast agent and scanned on a 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. Diameter and area stenosis were evaluated by 2 observers blinded from the true measures using 5 different software packages. Measurements were compared with the true measure of the vessel phantoms. The absolute difference in stenosis measurements and intraobserver and interobserver variabilities were assessed.

Results: All software packages show a trend toward larger differences for the smaller vessel phantoms. The absolute difference of the automatic measurements was significantly higher compared with that of the manual measurements in all 5 evaluated software packages for all vessel phantoms (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Manual stenosis measurements are significantly more accurate compared with automatic measurements, and therefore, manual adjustments are still essential for noninvasive assessment of coronary artery stenosis.

MeSH terms

  • Contrast Media
  • Coronary Angiography / methods*
  • Coronary Stenosis / diagnostic imaging*
  • Models, Cardiovascular*
  • Observer Variation
  • Phantoms, Imaging*
  • Radiographic Image Enhancement / methods
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Software*
  • Triiodobenzoic Acids

Substances

  • Contrast Media
  • Triiodobenzoic Acids
  • iodixanol