Sirolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stent implantation in patients with ostial lesions

Int J Cardiol. 2010 Nov 5;145(1):162-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.07.043. Epub 2009 Aug 28.

Abstract

Introduction: To investigate the efficacy of implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in the ostium of coronary arteries.

Methods: We assigned 96 patients with lesions located in ostias of the coronary circulation to receive a SES or a bare-metal stent (BMS).

Results: At follow-up the late lumen loss was 0.07 mm in the SES versus 1.06 mm in the BMS group (p<0.001); -0.04 mm versus 0.11 mm (p = 0.12) in the neighbour ostium. The rate of target lesion revascularisation was 2% with SES and 39% with BMS (p<0.001), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) 6% versus 41% (p = 0.001).

Conclusions: In patients with ostial coronary lesions the angiographic outcome is improved and the long-term MACE rate is low after SES compared with BMS implantation.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Letter

MeSH terms

  • Acute Coronary Syndrome / pathology
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome / therapy
  • Coronary Restenosis
  • Coronary Vessels / pathology*
  • Drug-Eluting Stents / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Metals* / adverse effects
  • Middle Aged
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Sirolimus / administration & dosage*
  • Stents* / adverse effects
  • Thrombosis / etiology
  • Thrombosis / pathology

Substances

  • Metals
  • Sirolimus