Variations of endoscopic and open repair of metopic craniosynostosis

J Craniofac Surg. 2009 Sep;20(5):1439-44. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181af1555.

Abstract

In contrast to sagittal craniosynostosis, the role of endoscopic, minimally invasive approaches in the treatment of metopic craniosynostosis with resulting trigonocephaly is not as well defined. We reviewed the senior authors' (H.M. and S.C.) clinical experience in the treatment of children with metopic craniosynostosis using a variety of endoscopic and open techniques. Thirty-three patients were treated at a single institution during a 5-year period with between 3 and 8 years of follow-up. Sixteen patients underwent 3 variations of endoscopic approaches, and 17 patients had open fronto-orbital advancement. Clinical parameters of the 2 groups were examined including age at surgery, blood loss, operative time, transfusion volume, hospital stay, complications, use of postoperative cranial banding, and the need for reoperation for persistent deformity. The various endoscopic and open techniques used by the authors in the treatment of metopic craniosynostosis are discussed in detail, including rational for individual technique selection and preliminary impressions regarding clinical outcome.

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Blood Loss, Surgical
  • Blood Transfusion
  • Child, Preschool
  • Cranial Sutures / abnormalities*
  • Cranial Sutures / surgery
  • Craniosynostoses / surgery*
  • Endoscopy / methods*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Frontal Bone / abnormalities*
  • Frontal Bone / surgery
  • Head Protective Devices
  • Hospitalization
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
  • Orbit / surgery
  • Orthotic Devices
  • Osteotomy / methods
  • Patient Care Planning
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures / methods*
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Recurrence
  • Reoperation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome