Loop-anchor purse-string versus endoscopic clips for gastric closure: a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery comparison study using burst pressures

Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Dec;70(6):1225-30. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.05.019. Epub 2009 Oct 20.

Abstract

Background: The success of natural orifice surgery depends on a reliable, secure closure of the opening in the gut. Few tests of the integrity of these closures have been published.

Objective: To determine whether a gastrotomy can be closed safely and effectively from within the stomach by using looped T-anchors-a novel, endoscopically placed device.

Design: Head-to-head comparison trial of 2 closure methods in 9 explanted porcine stomachs.

Setting: Animal laboratory.

Intervention: Paired gastrotomies were made in porcine explants. One was closed by using endoscopic clips, and the other was closed by using modified T-anchors in a purse-string fashion.

Main outcome measurements: Gastric transmural pressure gradients at bursting of these closures were measured while the explanted stomachs were inflated with a high-pressure insufflator.

Results: The mean burst pressure of the looped T-anchors was 27.3 mm Hg, whereas that of the clip closures was 14 mm Hg. By using 10 mm Hg as a threshold for a "secure" closure, 7 of 9 clip closures failed to meet the threshold value, whereas all 9 of the T-anchor closures met or exceeded the threshold value (P = .0023, 2-tailed Fisher exact test).

Limitation: Nonsurvival study.

Conclusion: Looped T-anchors provide a secure gastric closure for natural orifice surgery and are superior to endoscopic clips for this purpose.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal / methods*
  • Pressure
  • Stomach / surgery*
  • Surgical Instruments*
  • Suture Anchors*
  • Swine
  • Treatment Outcome