We have examined the effects of prednisone, cyclosporine, azathioprine, and RBC-adsorbed goat antidog antilymphocyte globulin on islet graft function in totally pancreatectomized canines with purified, quantitatively defined, autologous, or allogeneic islets transplanted to the liver. The objectives were twofold: (1) to determine the potential detrimental effects to islet autograft function of the aforementioned agents, and (2) to determine the relative efficacy of the "nontoxic" agents in prolonging purified islet allograft function administered in doses that would be considered tolerable in human. The islet autograft studies demonstrated that prednisone given in doses of 1-2 mg/kg/day had a detrimental effect on islet autograft function, and that the combinations of immunosuppression involving CsA, azathioprine, and ALG were not detrimental to islet autograft function to the extent that hyperglycemia would ensue. In the subsequent allograft studies, three groups of canines received islet transplants: (1) controls (n = 5; 7860 +/- 750 islets/kg/weight), (2) canines given CsA and azathioprine (n = 6; 6810 +/- 890 islets/kg/body weight), and (3) canines given CsA, azathioprine, and RBC-adsorbed goat antidog ALG (n = 8; 6540 +/- 710 islets/kg/body weight). The mean (+/- SE) day of rejection (serum glucose greater than or equal to 200 mg/dl) in the group of canine islet allograft recipients receiving CsA, azathioprine, and ALG was 11.8 +/- 1.4 days--significantly prolonged versus islet allograft recipients receiving no immunosuppression (mean survival 4.8 +/- 1.1 days, P less than 0.03), and versus allograft recipients receiving CsA/azathioprine without ALG (mean survival 4.4 +/- 1.4 days, P less than 0.05). Prednisone appears to be detrimental to islet graft function, even at low doses. ALG was not toxic, and significantly extended the survival of canine islet allografts. The inclusion of steroids as part of maintenance immunosuppression, or as treatment for acute rejection of islets, in human islet transplants should be reconsidered, whereas ALG or other antilymphocyte agents should continue to be used.