Comparison of the kinetic frictional force between conventional plastic brackets with thermoplastic low-friction module ligation and self-ligating brackets

World J Orthod. 2009 Fall;10(3):220-3.

Abstract

Aim: To compare the kinetic frictional force of a conventional plastic preadjusted bracket with thermoplastic low-friction module ligation and a self-ligating bracket.

Materials and methods: The testing model consisted of four 0.022-inch conventional plastic preadjusted brackets; four 0.022-inch self-ligating brackets for the first premolar, canine, and lateral and central incisors; and a 0.014-inch superelastic nickel-titanium and a 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless steel wire. The brackets were either aligned for both wires or out of line by 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mm for only the 0.014-inch superelastic wire. The wires were pulled for 3.0 mm at a speed of 0.1 mm per second. Unpaired t tests were used to compare the mean differences of the measurements between the two bracket systems with both wires.

Results: No significant difference in the kinetic frictional force between the two bracket systems and the two wires were found for the 0.014-inch superelastic wire at 0-mm deflection.

Conclusion: Both bracket systems demonstrate low friction, which is beneficial for effective orthodontic tooth movement with light forces.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Bicuspid / pathology
  • Cuspid / pathology
  • Dental Alloys / chemistry
  • Dental Materials / chemistry*
  • Elasticity
  • Friction
  • Humans
  • Incisor / pathology
  • Nickel / chemistry
  • Orthodontic Appliance Design*
  • Orthodontic Brackets*
  • Orthodontic Wires
  • Plastics / chemistry*
  • Stainless Steel / chemistry
  • Stress, Mechanical
  • Surface Properties
  • Titanium / chemistry
  • Tooth Movement Techniques / instrumentation

Substances

  • Dental Alloys
  • Dental Materials
  • Plastics
  • titanium nickelide
  • Stainless Steel
  • Nickel
  • Titanium