[The significance of recurrent nerve paresis for the operability of lung cancer]

Ugeskr Laeger. 1991 Jan 7;153(2):109-11.
[Article in Danish]

Abstract

The object of the study was a reassessment of the old but still widely accepted apophthegm that recurrent nerve palsy prohibits surgery in patients with pulmonary cancer. Out of 1,279 patients admitted over a 10-year period with proven or suspected pulmonary cancer, 23 were found to have recurrent nerve paralysis. Eleven of these were found inoperable by the preoperative work-up while 12 underwent thoracotomy. In three cases it was possible to perform a left upper lobectomy, which was considered to be radical both macro- and microscopically in two cases. The conclusion is that paralysis of the recurrent nerve, as might be foreseen, gravely worsens the prognosis, inverting the usual ratio of 80:20 between resections and exploratory thoracotomies. This, however, leaves a small group which will benefit from surgery, particularly considering the lack of alternative therapy.

Publication types

  • Case Reports
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Carcinoma / surgery*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Paralysis / complications*
  • Prognosis
  • Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve*