The ARBITER 6-HALTS Trial (Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol 6-HDL and LDL Treatment Strategies in Atherosclerosis): final results and the impact of medication adherence, dose, and treatment duration

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 15;55(24):2721-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.017.

Abstract

Objectives: This report describes the final results of the ARBITER 6-HALTS (Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol 6-HDL and LDL Treatment Strategies in Atherosclerosis) trial.

Background: The ARBITER 6-HALTS trial was terminated early on the basis of a pre-specified interim analysis showing superiority of niacin over ezetimibe on change in carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT). After termination, an additional 107 subjects completed a close-out assessment.

Methods: Patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD equivalent with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dl and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <50 mg/dl for men or 55 mg/dl for women while receiving stable statin treatment were randomly assigned to ezetimibe (10 mg/day) or extended-release niacin (target dose, 2,000 mg/day). The primary end point was change in mean CIMT, analyzed according to a last observation carried forward method. The relationships of study medication adherence, dosage, and cumulative exposure (product of adherence, dose, and time) with change in CIMT were explored.

Results: Results in 315 patients included 208 with 14-month follow-up and 107 after mean treatment of 7 +/- 3 months. Niacin (n = 154) resulted in significant reduction (regression) in mean CIMT (-0.0102 +/- 0.0026 mm; p < 0.001) and maximal CIMT (-0.0124 +/- 0.0036 mm; p = 0.001), whereas ezetimibe (n = 161) did not reduce mean CIMT (-0.0016 +/- 0.0024 mm; p = 0.88) or maximal CIMT (-0.0005 +/- 0.0029 mm; p = 0.88) compared with baseline. There was a significant difference between ezetimibe and niacin treatment groups on mean changes in CIMT, favoring niacin, for both mean CIMT (p = 0.016) and maximal CIMT (p = 0.01). Increased cumulative drug exposure was related to regression of CIMT with niacin, and progression of CIMT with ezetimibe.

Conclusions: Niacin induces regression of CIMT and is superior to ezetimibe for patients taking statins. (Comparative Study of the Effect of Ezetimibe Versus Extended-Release Niacin on Atherosclerosis; NCT00397657).

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Anticholesteremic Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Atherosclerosis / blood
  • Atherosclerosis / diagnosis
  • Atherosclerosis / drug therapy*
  • Azetidines / administration & dosage
  • Carotid Artery, Common / diagnostic imaging
  • Cholesterol, HDL / blood
  • Cholesterol, HDL / drug effects*
  • Cholesterol, LDL / blood
  • Cholesterol, LDL / drug effects*
  • Coronary Disease / blood
  • Coronary Disease / diagnosis
  • Coronary Disease / drug therapy*
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Ezetimibe
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Medication Adherence*
  • Niacin / administration & dosage
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Tunica Intima / diagnostic imaging
  • Ultrasonography

Substances

  • Anticholesteremic Agents
  • Azetidines
  • Cholesterol, HDL
  • Cholesterol, LDL
  • Niacin
  • Ezetimibe

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT00397657