Good outcome and valve function despite Medtronic-corevalve underexpansion

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Dec 1;76(7):1022-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22648.

Abstract

An 80-year old nun with severe calcific aortic stenosis and a bicuspid aortic valve was referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. She was declined for conventional surgery on the basis of poor left ventricular function, frailty, and a logistic EuroSCORE of 29.66. A 29-mm Medtronic-Corevalve bioprosthesis was implanted by transfemoral route. The inflow portion of the stent frame was grossly underexpanded. However, aortic valve area at 1.3 cm(2) was more than satisfactory for a body surface area of 1.29 m(2) (indexed area 1.0 cm(2)/m(2), peak gradient 23, and mean 16 mmHg). There was an early sustained improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) status, and there was no change in valvular function at 2 year follow-up. This case highlights that gross underexpansion of the Medtronic-Corevalve stent frame is compatible with good bioprosthetic function and excellent symptomatic recovery.

Publication types

  • Case Reports

MeSH terms

  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aortic Valve / abnormalities*
  • Aortic Valve / diagnostic imaging
  • Aortic Valve / physiopathology
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis / diagnostic imaging
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis / physiopathology
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis / therapy*
  • Calcinosis / diagnostic imaging
  • Calcinosis / physiopathology
  • Calcinosis / therapy*
  • Cardiac Catheterization / instrumentation*
  • Female
  • Femoral Artery
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / instrumentation*
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / methods
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis*
  • Hemodynamics
  • Humans
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Recovery of Function
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ultrasonography
  • Ventricular Function, Left