Intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced MRI and unenhanced SSFP sequences of stenotic and non-stenotic pulmonary artery diameters

Rofo. 2011 Jan;183(1):47-53. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245568. Epub 2010 Jul 22.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the agreement of pulmonary artery diameters assessed with 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) and a 2D balanced steady-state-free precession sequence (bSSFP) in non-stenotic and stenotic pulmonary arteries (PA).

Methods and materials: 44 right and left PAs (30 non-stenotic and 14 stenotic) were examined in 23 consecutive patients by performing CE-MRA as well as bSSFP. Two independent readers determined the transverse diameters of the PA.

Results: No significant difference in diameter measurements was found between CE-MRA and bSSFP (p = 0.8608 for the stenotic and p = 0.6208 for the non-stenotic PA). Bland-Altman analysis revealed good agreement between CE-MRA and bSSFP for both the non-stenotic (mean bias, 0.07 cm; with 95 % limits of agreement, ± 0.34 cm) and the stenotic (mean bias, 0.05 cm; with 95 % limits of agreement, ± 0.30 cm) PA.

Conclusion: bSSFP allows rapid and accurate determination of PA diameters without the use of ionizing radiation and the risk of contrast media-associated side-effects.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Contrast Media
  • Functional Laterality
  • Humans
  • Image Enhancement / methods
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods
  • Observer Variation
  • Pulmonary Artery / anatomy & histology
  • Pulmonary Artery / pathology*
  • Pulmonary Valve Stenosis / classification
  • Pulmonary Valve Stenosis / pathology*
  • Regression Analysis
  • Tetralogy of Fallot / pathology

Substances

  • Contrast Media