The relationship between INR and development of hemorrhage with placement of ventriculostomy

J Trauma. 2011 May;70(5):1112-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e7c2ae.

Abstract

Background: This study seeks to evaluate the relationship between the risk of symptomatic hemorrhage from ventriculostomy placement and International Normalized Ratio (INR) in patients who received a ventriculostomy after traumatic brain injury.

Methods: Patients who received a ventriculostomy after traumatic brain injury between June 2007 and July 2008 were identified and their medical records were abstracted for information.

Results: At the time of ventriculostomy placement, 32 patients had an INR<1.2, 26 patients had an INR 1.2 to 1.4, 12 patients had an INR 1.4 to 1.6, and one patient had an INR>1.6 (INR=1.61). No significant difference in the risk of hemorrhage between the groups was observed: 9.4%, 3.9%, 8.3%, and 0%, respectively (p=0.73). In a subgroup analysis of patients who received ventriculostomy in the Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit within 24 hours of admission (n=54), the average time between admission and ventriculostomy placement in patients who did not receive fresh frozen plasma was 6.8 hours compared with 9.3 hours (p=0.03) for those who did.

Conclusions: In this retrospective study, INRs between 1.2 and 1.6 appeared to be acceptable for a neurosurgeon to place an emergent ventriculostomy in a patient with traumatic brain injury.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Alabama / epidemiology
  • Brain Injuries / complications
  • Brain Injuries / epidemiology
  • Brain Injuries / surgery*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Intracranial Hemorrhages / diagnosis
  • Intracranial Hemorrhages / epidemiology
  • Intracranial Hemorrhages / etiology*
  • Male
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Ventriculostomy / adverse effects*