Enlarged tracheoesophageal puncture after total laryngectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Head Neck. 2011 Jan;33(1):20-30. doi: 10.1002/hed.21399.

Abstract

Background: Enlargement of the tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) is a challenging complication after laryngectomy with TEP. We sought to estimate the rate of enlarged puncture, associated pneumonia rates, potential risk factors, and conservative treatments excluding complete surgical TEP closure.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted (1978-2008). A summary risk estimate was calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis model.

Results: Twenty-seven peer-reviewed manuscripts were included. The rate of enlarged puncture and/or leakage around the prosthesis was reported in 23 articles (range, 1% to 29%; summary risk estimate, 7.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8% to 9.6%). Temporary removal of the prosthesis and TEP-site injections were the most commonly reported conservative treatments. Prosthetic diameter (p = .076) and timing of TEP (p = .297) were analyzed as risk factors; however, radiotherapy variables were inconsistently reported.

Conclusion: The overall risk of enlarged puncture seems relatively low, but it remains a rehabilitative challenge. Future research should clearly establish risk factors for enlarged puncture and optimal conservative management.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Esophagus / surgery
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Laryngeal Neoplasms / surgery
  • Laryngectomy / methods*
  • Laryngectomy / rehabilitation
  • Larynx, Artificial*
  • Male
  • Postoperative Complications / diagnosis
  • Postoperative Complications / therapy
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Prosthesis Implantation
  • Punctures / adverse effects*
  • Punctures / methods
  • Risk Assessment
  • Speech, Alaryngeal / instrumentation
  • Speech, Alaryngeal / methods*
  • Trachea / surgery
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Voice Quality