Incidence, pattern and management of bile duct injuries during cholecystectomy: experience from a single center

Dig Surg. 2010;27(5):375-9. doi: 10.1159/000314813. Epub 2010 Oct 13.

Abstract

Background: The incidence and pattern of bile duct injury (BDI) may be underreported because of the heterogeneous referral from multiple institutions.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of data from 5,782 cholecystectomies performed between 1989 and 2007 was done. BDI were categorized into Strasberg types.

Results: Fifty-seven (1%) patients sustained BDI. Ten of 57 (18%) patients had minor BDI (type A-10), 25/57 (44%) had major BDI (type C-3, type D-14, type E-8) and BDI could not be classified in the remaining 22/57 (39%) patients. Twenty-one of 25 (84%) major BDI were detected at operation - 21/57 (37%) injuries were detected and repaired intra-operatively. The other 36/57 (63%) injuries were detected after operation - 11 were managed expectantly, 5 had endoscopic stenting, 3 underwent percutaneous drainage of bilioma, 1 had a laparoscopic clipping of the subvesical duct, 4 underwent laparotomy and 12 required a combination of interventions. Five of the 57 (9%) patients died. At follow-up, 1 patient developed bile duct stricture which was managed endoscopically. All other patients were doing well at the last follow-up.

Conclusions: In experienced centers, most of the major BDI can be detected and managed during cholecystectomy. Good results can be achieved by judicious selection of a combination of interventions in the majority of patients.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Bile Ducts / injuries*
  • Bile Ducts / surgery*
  • Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / adverse effects*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Intraoperative Complications / surgery
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications / surgery
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stents
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Wounds and Injuries / epidemiology
  • Wounds and Injuries / surgery
  • Young Adult