[Varying concentration of ropivacaine with stimulating catheters on sciatic nerve blocking for postoperative analgesia: comparison of efficacy]

Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2010 Oct 18;42(5):535-8.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To determine the most suitable concentration of ropivacaine on sciatic nerve blocks with stimulating catheters.

Methods: Sixty adult patients undergoing surgeries involving the foot and ankle were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=20): The patients in group A were given 0.1% ropivacaine, the patients in groups B and C received 0.125% and 0.15% ropivacaine respectively. We combined ultrasound and nerve stimulators for popliteal sciatic nerve blocks, and then placed stimulating catheters for postoperative analgesia. VAS and adverse effects were monitored 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h after surgery.

Results: The difference of VAS was of significance in statistics 6 h and 12 h postoperation. VAS in Group A at postoperative 6 h and 12 h was significantly higher than that in Groups B and C(P<0.05). The incidence of motor disturbance and limbs numbness in Group C was significantly higher than that in Groups A and B (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the satisfaction of the three groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion: The most suitable concentration of ropivacaine on sciatic nerve blocks with stimulating catheters is 0.125%.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Amides / administration & dosage*
  • Analgesia
  • Anesthetics, Local / administration & dosage
  • Catheterization* / methods
  • Female
  • Foot / surgery
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nerve Block / methods*
  • Pain, Postoperative / drug therapy*
  • Ropivacaine
  • Sciatic Nerve*
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Amides
  • Anesthetics, Local
  • Ropivacaine