Administration of local anesthetic agents to decrease pain associated with peripheral vascular access

J Infus Nurs. 2010 Nov-Dec;33(6):353-61. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0b013e3181f85628.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare a variety of local anesthetic agents before starting an intravenous (i.v.) device to determine which method is the most comfortable for patients. Using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pretest-posttest experimental design, the study compared 5 treatment groups (anesthetic spray, placebo spray, anesthetic intradermal injection, placebo intradermal injection, and a control group with no local anesthetic agent) in 84 emergency department patients. Pain was measured with a visual analog scale before and after the application of the local anesthetic agents and after i.v. insertion. Pain was significantly higher in the anesthetic intradermal injection group 1 minute after anesthetic application compared with the other treatment groups. Pain ratings 3 minutes after i.v. insertion were found to be similar for the 5 treatment groups. These study results do not support the use of intradermal anesthetic agents before i.v. catheter insertion.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anesthetics, Local / administration & dosage
  • Anesthetics, Local / adverse effects
  • Anesthetics, Local / therapeutic use*
  • Anti-Infective Agents, Local
  • Catheterization, Peripheral / adverse effects*
  • Catheterization, Peripheral / instrumentation
  • Catheterization, Peripheral / methods
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lidocaine / administration & dosage
  • Lidocaine / adverse effects
  • Lidocaine / therapeutic use*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pain / drug therapy*
  • Pain / etiology
  • Pain / nursing
  • Pain Measurement
  • Placebo Effect
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Anesthetics, Local
  • Anti-Infective Agents, Local
  • Lidocaine