Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the administration of inhaled beta-agonists delivered via a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with spacers--as part of an evidence-based asthma pathway developed to manage acute asthma exacerbations in children at the emergency room level and in inpatient management--against administration via nebulization.
Design: Case with historical control.
Setting: KK Women's and Children's Hospital (Singapore).
Participants: A total of 19,951 children (infants to older children) aged 18 years and younger who attended the emergency room for asthma exacerbations.
Main outcome measures: Average length of stay, proportion admitted to high dependency or intensive care, proportion readmitted for unresolved symptoms within 72 hr, cost per patient and overall.
Results: There was no increase in the mean proportion of emergency room attendances admitted to inpatient care with use of an MDI (mean difference 0.97%, 95% CI: -1.6-3.5%, P = 0.447), nor of children admitted to intensive care (0.21 vs. 0.20 pre- and post-pathway, P = 0.827) or to high dependency units (2.21 vs. 1.37 pre- and post-pathway, P = 0.200) but a significant reduction in the within 72 hr re-attendance rate (mean difference 1.4%, 95% CI: 0.78-2.0%, P < 0.001) with use of an MDI. The average length and cost per patient for an inpatient stay for acute asthma exacerbations was reduced with use of an MDI.
Conclusions: The use of an MDI with spacer as part of an evidence-based asthma pathway was effective in the management of acute asthma exacerbations in the emergency room setting and for inpatient management.
Keywords: acute asthma; asthma pathway; efficacy; metered-dose inhalers; nebulizers.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.