[Research on usual care: Assessing the qualification criteria of the current legal framework]

Presse Med. 2011 Apr;40(4 Pt 1):e189-96. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2010.10.022. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the current legal framework pertaining to research on usual care and to check the adequacy of its use in relation to this research.

Method: Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed to evaluate the research on usual care protocols managed by the Department of Clinical Research and Development (DRCD), Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), since Law no. 2004-806 of 9 August 2004 relative to public health policy, came into force in 2006.

Results: Fifty-five research projects were analysed. Some projects had diverging qualifications or had been re-qualified (12 projects).

Discussion: Misunderstandings of the law by the actors involved in research as well as an overly narrow definition of research on usual care within the law were the main causes of these divergences.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Biomedical Research / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic / legislation & jurisprudence
  • France
  • Health Policy / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Health Services Research / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Humans
  • Informed Consent / legislation & jurisprudence
  • National Health Programs / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Patient Selection
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Research Design / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Surveys and Questionnaires